Let’s enjoy English 22nd

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《What kind of organization is the Cabinet Legislation Bureau?》

…building their own career still more there.

As to the human resource on the top, making the career bureaucrats who transferred from other ministry promote from within, and making them be the director in the legislation bureau. The way used to be adopted. It was done as the long standing tradition.

But Mr. Abe appointed the one who was the ambassador in France the director of the legislation bureau of the Cabinet August in 2013.

Making the director promote from within

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《What kind of organization is the Cabinet Legislation Bureau?》

It was the long standing tradition, but Mr. Abe broke the usage and taking the director from other different position altogether as if it had been a parachute. Moreover the director who was from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was the first time. It’s unusual human resource which had never been, therefore the legislation bureau of the Cabinet rebelled against it violently.

Furthermore, the new director was the one who thought like the next. Japan should allow the exercise on…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《What kind of organization is the Cabinet Legislation Bureau?》

Japan should allow the exercise on the right of the collective self defense. Adopting the one who thought like that as the director was unusual.

The Cabinet had respected the judgement on the Cabinet Legislation Bureau until then, but undergoing complete change, if disobeying making them obey, replacing the one on the top with other, making the policy change into acceptance on the right of collective self defense. It’s unreasonable.

The problem is legal certainty

【The security legislation is against the constitution?】

But the Special Advisor to the Prime Minister said the legal certainty doesn’t matter, and it caused the controversy.

The legal certainty, in short, the successive Cabinet Legislation Bureau used to say though having the right of the collective self defense, but they couldn’t exercise, but one Cabinet replaced the director with other and making the judgement on the Cabinet Legislation Bureau change. The legal certainty is unstable then.

《The problem caused by the interpretation on the constitution. The case on Germany》

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The problem caused the change on the interpretation of the constitution. The case on Germany》

What happens if changing the interpretation on the constitution? The case on Germany shows us how awful it is, the author said like that.

Without saying the constitution, it is said the organic law in Germany. After the World War Ⅱ, Germany divided into east and west and started. The West Germany didn’t think they made the constitution of their own alone, after unified they would do, and until then they adopted the organic law, though…

【The security legislation is against the constitution?】

《The problem is caused by the change on the interpretation of the constitution. The case of Germany》

…though it’s the constitution essentially, they distinguish the constitution from the organic law just in case, but having said that, after merging with the East Germany, without changing it, it remains the organic law still more.

The West Germany is a defeated country like Japan, but the thing which is different from Japan is its territory was divided into east and west by the Cold War, the East Germany had a military, and Soviet…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The problem is caused by the change….》

…and the Soviet which was at the back of the East Germany had the strong military power, so the West Germany was forced to have the Military Power as the military from the beginning, but Germany used to invade in the past, it needed a brake, the rule was made. It wouldn’t dispatch extra territory of the NATO.

The NATO is the collective defense system going on from the time of the Cold War when the East and West Europe confronted each other, the East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Soviet…

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《The problem is caused by the change…》

…the East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Soviet may have invaded the West Germany, the people in the West Germany never knew what might happen. They seemed to feel anxiously.

They may have attacked even to France, Belgium, or Holland, the people of those countries felt uneasy.

The people who scared of the invasion by the East Europe and Soviet have founded the NATO, and America and Canada have taken part in.

If one of the nation like Belgium or Holland is invaded from Soviet, all the nations…

【What dose it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The problem is caused by the change….》

….each nation taking part in the NATO received each of them was attacked, and all of them will fight back together. It’s the collective defense system.

On the other hand, Soviet also thought the West German may have attacked likewise, and founded Warsaw Pact Organization. Its abbreviation is WPO.

Both of the NATO and WPO are the collective defense system.

If taking the train or driving a car in Europe, we can understand why the NATO is founded there, the author said like that and continued.

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《The problem is caused by the change…》

As far as the one can see, the plain spreads out there. If the tank corps come there, stopping them is hard. The plain spreads out in both of France and Germany constantly, and if hundreds of tank unit belonged to Soviet comes there, the people in the West Europe were powerless against it. They are occupied in a flash. How terrible it is.

Though the author said like that, I’ve never been overseas, so I’m not sure of it, but in short, it seems to be terrible so much.

The NATO was born from the feeling…

【メイちゃん、あずきちゃんへ】

オッハー、元気でやってるかな？😊

ミクルがもうすぐ閉鎖してしまうとは、驚きだね。😲

残念なことだけど、メイちゃんともここで話す機会もそんなに無いね😥

今まで応援ありがとう。感謝してます。🙇

ミクルが閉鎖されても、他の掲示板で英語の投稿を続けて行きたいと思う。ハンネはそのままでね。また会う事もあるかもしれないね。その時はよろしくです。😊

この間は、レスありがとう。🐭

では、良い日曜日を過ごしてね😁

• << 216 銀三さん、あれからレスもせずにごめんなさいね。🙏 今、カラオケ店内に居ます。 あさってからスレ立てが出来ない様ですが､ まだ２つのスレを閉めなければいけなかった訳を書いていませんでしたね。 今夜遅くか明日には書きたいと思います。 ここをお借りしていいでしょうか。 ３〜４レスになりそうです。早い話が、私の家族に英語を見ると逃げる人がいるんですが、 ちょっと１月５日から揉めてしまって💧 あ、銀三さんにご迷惑がかかる事はありませんので、安心して下さいね。 またこちらで良ければ書かせて下さいね。 日本語のスレはちょっと怒られちゃったので💧　再開出来なくてすみません。 ではまた、必ず来ますね。 英語、頑張って下さい、続けて応援します。 (^_^)/~

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constituition】

《The problem is caused by the change…》

The NATO was born from the feeling of fear that they never knew when the tank unit belonged to Soviet attacked the Europe, and the West Germany joined in the NATO.

If France or Belgium are attacked, the West Germany attack with the two of nations, and the military force belonged to Germany can dispatch so as to help the nations taking part in the NATO, but being unable to send outside the NATO.

It means like that, but the problem is from here.

Germany didn’t dispatch the military force…

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

Germany didn’t dispatch its military force so as to help the multinational force leading by America in the Gulf War, for both of Iraq and Kuwait were the extra territorial for the NATO. Instead of it, it donated the large amount of money, but America criticized it harshly,

Do you think it is all right as long as offering the money?

《The exercise on the right of collective self defense caused more than fifty victims in Germany》

As receiving the criticism, Germany changed the interpretation on the organic law, allowing its federal…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constituition】

《The exercise on the right of self defense…》
…allowing its federal military force to dispatch to the extra territorial and changed the interpretation on the organic law. It’s the Kohl Prime Minister who took the lead.

Without changing the organic law, settling by changing the interpretation on the organic law, and the federal constitutional court also stamped approval that as long as the agreement on the assembly is, it’s all right.

As Germany revised the organic law dozens of times, it must have gone through the procedure on the…

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《The exercise on the right of collective self defense….》

…it must have gone through the procedure on the amendment of the organic law, but as there was the strong opposition among the people, so Germany pushed through with the form of changing the interpretation.

After changing the interpretation on the organic law, Germany dispatched its military force to the extra territorial of the NATO actually. It started from the attack against Afghanistan by America.

Al Qaeda which is the international terrorist organization attack America. It’s …

>> 211 【メイちゃん、あずきちゃんへ】 オッハー、元気でやってるかな？😊 ミクルがもうすぐ閉鎖してしまうとは、驚きだね。😲 残念な… 銀三さん、あれからレスもせずにごめんなさいね。🙏

今、カラオケ店内に居ます。

あさってからスレ立てが出来ない様ですが､

まだ２つのスレを閉めなければいけなかった訳を書いていませんでしたね。

今夜遅くか明日には書きたいと思います。

ここをお借りしていいでしょうか。

３〜４レスになりそうです。早い話が、私の家族に英語を見ると逃げる人がいるんですが、

ちょっと１月５日から揉めてしまって💧

あ、銀三さんにご迷惑がかかる事はありませんので、安心して下さいね。

またこちらで良ければ書かせて下さいね。

日本語のスレはちょっと怒られちゃったので💧　再開出来なくてすみません。

ではまた、必ず来ますね。

英語、頑張って下さい、続けて応援します。

(^_^)/~

あずきちゃん、了解！😊

カラオケ楽しんでね🎤

いつも応援ありがとう👍

• << 236 銀三さん、こんばんは。 こちらの英語スレに何レスもしては悪いので、スレを立てました。 (^^ゞ タイトルは「魚座は幸せ」を英語にした(つもりの様な)ものです。😅 まだこれからレスしますので、遅くなったらすみません。 一通り書き終わるまで、自分だけ投稿、にしました。銀三さんがレスして下さる頃に開けますね。 ではまた。何だかすみません。🙏 (^_^)/~

＞＞215

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The exercise on the right of collective self defense….》

It’s the simultaneous terrorist attack against America on 9.11, and America invoked the right of individual self defense as revenge and attacked Afghanistan. As America was attacked, each nation of NATO triggered the right of collective self defense and attacked Afghanistan. If one of them is attacked, all the others will fight back together. It’s the rule in the NATO.

After America and England started to attack Afghanistan, each of member nations in NATO was sent to…

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

《The exercise on the right of self defense…》

…each of member nations in NATO was sent to Afghanistan with the form of supporting America and England.

Germany also started to dispatch its Federal Army to Afghanistan from 2002, but sending to the no combat zone alone so as to prevent it from being involved in the battle. It’s like Japan.

After the attack against Afghanistan by America and England settled down, the military force of Germany joined in ISAF founded being based on the resolution of the United Nations Security Council.

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The exercise on the right of collective self defense…》

ISAF is an abbreviation of international security assistance force.

The military force in Germany were engaged in the duty of logistical or reconstruction support, but in the middle of its activities, they were attacked by Taliban which is the Islamic extremists and anti government armed group, and the large amount of the soldiers were killed, and making matters worse, there was a suicide, so the number of the victims reached no less than fifty.

And after returning to…

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

And after returning to Germany, large amount of the people who used to be the soldier developed the PTSD and are suffering from it.

The PTSD is an abbreviation of post traumatic stress disorder.

As changing the interpretation on the organic law and sending the military force to the non combat zone, victims more than fifty were caused, for the situation was different from the explanation by the government altogether. First of all the non combat area doesn’t exist.

As Taliban appears in unexpected places, if going to Afghanistan, no one….

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

…no one can predict when or where to be attacked, but the government of Germany told its soldiers Afghanistan was safe.

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution in the Commission of the Constitution》

It’s the incident on the commission of the constitution in the House of Representatives in which the argument of being example in Germany caused, especially moving the public opinion greatly this time.

There was almost none of the opposition movement on the security bills until then, but the tide turned.

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《Three unsworn witnesses said it was against…》

It was the commission of the constitution on the fourth day June when three unsworn witnesses who were experts in the constitutional law said it was against the constitution.

Some people seem to misunderstand that the remark was done in public hearing in the middle of the deliberation on the security bills, but it’s in the wrong.

It was done at the commission of constitution in the House of Representatives which wasn’t related to the security legislation.

As Mr. Abe wanted to change the….

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

As Mr. Abe wanted to change the constitution, he decided to establish the Commission of Constitution in the both of the House of Representatives and Councilors.

The Commission of the Constitution is the organization researching the constitution in Japan and basic law relating to the constitution in our nation deeply and examining the initiative on the original plan of the amendment of the constitution or the amendment on the constitution itself.

It was at the ….

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

It was at the time of Yoshihiko Noda Cabinet of the Japan Democratic Party when the organization started to operate actually, and it went on when the second Abe government started.

When proposing the amendment on the constitution, which provision should they adopt? Whether or not narrowing down on one point? Or should they propose summing up some of them? Those things are deliberated.

Mr. Abe was so passionate about the amendment on the constitution that he piled up…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

…that he piled up the discussion steadily and tried to arrange the preparation of proposal on amendment of the constitution.

In the commission of the constitution, being aside from the deliberation on the security bills, constitutionalism, the limit on the amendment, and the constitutional review of legislation was the theme on that day.

The constitutionalism means being based on the constitution, limiting the political power.

The constitutional review means…

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution….》

The constitutional review means examining whether or not the court complies the law, order, rule and the disposal with the constitution, and if being unconstitutional, making its effectiveness invalid. It is done so as to prevent the constitution which is the supreme law in the nation prevent from being infringed by the nation.

After finishing the opinion statement by three constitutional scholars, the Diet member belonged to the Japan Democratic Party asked the…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

…the Diet member belonging to the Japan Democratic Party asked the question whether or not the security bills they were discussing were against the constitution.

Then even the professor of Waseda university who was recommended by the Liberal Democratic Party said it was against the constitution, so Japan was in uproar.

Hajime Funada belonged to the Liberal Democratic Party recommended the professor. He was engaged in the Chief of Headquarters on the promotion of…

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

He was engaged in the Chief of Headquarters on the promotion of constitutional amendment.

The professor used to go on saying the exercise on the right of collective self defense was against constitution for a long time.

It seems that as to the one who is called to the Commission on the Constitution, no one knows it is recommended from what political party beforehand.

It’s not being recommended from the political party, but taking the form of inviting as the Commission….

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

…but taking the form of inventing as the Commission on the Constitution and listening to its opinion, so the professor didn’t seem to be invited from the Liberal Democratic Party a bit.

Why did Mr. Funad invite the professor?

The opinion on the Liberal Democratic Party divided into two at the deliberation of the Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets 特定秘密保護法案. Then the legal scholars who were liberal and were close to the opposition party said….

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》

Then the legal scholars who were liberal and were close to the opposition party said the Act on Protection of Specially Designated Secrets was against the law, but in spite of seem to be the liberal, the professor said it’s indispensable, so the Liberal Democratic Party invited him and made him state his opinion.

Mr. Funada remembered it and without researching how the professor thought of the right of the collective self defense, thinking the professor was on the …

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《Three of unsworn witnesses said it was against the constitution…》
…thinking the professor was on the side of the Liberal Democratic Party and recommended him.

It was the Japan Democratic Party which thought it was a golden opportunity. Though it was nothing to do with the theme on the review board, asking about the security legislations, annd all of the three of legal scholars who were the professors in university it was against the constitution.

Even the one who was recommended from the ruling party said it was against the….

【The security bills are against the constitution?】

Even the one who was recommended from the ruling party said it was against the constitution, so it was a big news.

After that the movement of opposing to the security legislation spread quickly.

《The right of collective self defense used to be against the constitution until then, but what kind of interpretation makes it constitutional?》

In spite that the legal scholars pointed out it was against the constitution one after another, the Cabinet Legislation Bureau didn’t revert the interpretation on the constitution.

The one who was chosen…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The right of collective self defense used to be ….》

The one who was chosen the chief of the Cabinet Legislation Bureau as trump card bringing the Cabinet Legislation Bureau to its knees retired May in 2014 and was dead June. He built the theory on the limited allowance of the exercise of the right of collective self defense in the short period of his stay and left the theory in the Legislation Bureau.

The one who showed its ability on the building of the theory was in the position of the No.2 in the Cabinet Legislation Bureau.

【The security legislations are against the constitution?】

《The right of collective self defense…》

The one who was in the position of the No.2 was the deputy director in the Cabinet Legislation Bureau. He was transferred from the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor. The director and the deputy director seemed to talk together and to build the theory newly.

The bureaucrat is good at finding an excuse on everything, so let’s find the excuse that the right of collective self defense isn’t against the constitution, so the new excuse was done. Then the chief made a statement on the excuse, but he …

>> 217 あずきちゃん、了解！😊 カラオケ楽しんでね🎤 いつも応援ありがとう👍 銀三さん、こんばんは。

こちらの英語スレに何レスもしては悪いので、スレを立てました。
(^^ゞ

タイトルは「魚座は幸せ」を英語にした(つもりの様な)ものです。😅

まだこれからレスしますので、遅くなったらすみません。

一通り書き終わるまで、自分だけ投稿、にしました。銀三さんがレスして下さる頃に開けますね。

ではまた。何だかすみません。🙏

(^_^)/~

＞＞236

こんばんは。😊

ミクルが終わるまでに、満レスには出来ないと思うので、あまり気にしなくてもいいよ。😄

新スレのカテゴリーを教えてくだされ😓

>> 237 スレタイは、

「✨️Pisces is Happy✨️」です。

今、２レス目が終わったところです。

お気遣いありがとうございますね。😉

»238

見つけたよ👍

こんにちは、あずきちゃん😊

きょうは、9時か、10時くらいには帰れると思う。帰る１時間くらい前に、また連絡するね😄

>> 240 こんにちは。☺️

返レスありがとうございます。😉

明日は朝１０時過ぎに出かけるので、今夜はあまり夜更かし出来ませんが、

午後１０時〜深夜０時位までならレス出来ると思います。

遅くまでお仕事お疲れ様です。
m(_ _)m

ミクルさんには、「休止」でしたらまた再開して欲しいですね❗

ではまた。👋

(^_^)/~

意外と早く終わった👍

９時までには帰れると思う😄

では、また後ほど🛵🗯️

>> 242 了解しました。

考えてみましたら、きょう中に慌ててレスしなくても、４月１４日まではレスは出来るんですよね。😅

でもせっかくなので、またここ見に来ますね。

(^_^)/~

我が家に到着😄

>> 244 おかえりなさい。😉

お仕事お疲れ様です。

そうしましたら、９時４０分から１０分間位開けましょうか？

もうちょっとあとが良かったら、その時間を書いて下さいね。

１レスして下さったら閉めますね。

(^_^)/~

了解👍️

>> 246 すみません、２分遅れましたが開けました。

ごめんなさいね。🙏

＞＞235

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The right of collective self defense…》

…but he was ill and retired when making a statement on it formally.

The deputy manager succeeded to it. He couldn’t say what his predecessor saying was in the wrong, moreover he was the one who made an excuse that the right of collective self defense wasn’t against the constitution, so he couldn’t put it back.

He showed an unbelievable example at the answer in the National Assembly like the next.
It’s the talk on the blowfish.

The member of Japan Democratic Party pursued, saying…

【The security legislation is against the constitution?】

《The right of collectives self defense…》

…saying if taking out one bowl of miso soup limitedly from the rotten one, it’s just rotten.

The deputy director answered, saying if it’s poisonous mushroom, no matter how we boil and roast, it’s inedible, even if biting only part of it, it will damage us, but it may have been a blowfish. As the blowfish has a poison, so if eating whole of it, it will hurt our body, but it’s all right as long as getting rid of poisonous part.

It means as to the right of collective self defense, it’s all right…

【What does it mean? The interpretation on the constitution】

《The right of collective self defense…》

…it’s admitted enough as long as removing the dangerous part. When listening to it, all of us were stunned.

Going overseas and fight so as to protect other nations. If comparing it with the poison of the pufferfish, it’s equivalent to the pufferfish liver. If eating it, we’ll be dead, so we have to get rid of it, except for it, it’s all right. It’s a shocking example.

【What’s the security bills? Ten changes in the law and one new law】

《Let’s look at its content》

The security bills formed…